|
|
Featured White Papers
- Why choose an Open Source BPM?
- 10 FAQs on Business Process Management
- Best Practices for Getting Started with BPM
- Free Your Devs From The Pain Of Java Redeploys
- Increase Velocity 40% by Using JRebel
- What Developers Want: The End of Application Redeploys
- Developer Productivity Report: Java Tools, Tech, Devs, and Data
- Coding with JRebel: Java Forever Changed
- Utilizing Fast Testing to Transform Java Development
- Do You Really Get Classloaders?
- Pragmatic Continuous Delivery with Jenkins, Nexus, and LiveRebel
- Your Next Java Web App: Less XML, No Long Restarts, Fewer Hassles
- Coding with JRebel, Java Forever Changed
- 2012 Developer Productivity Report: Java Tools, Tech, Devs, and Data
I agree - EJB 3 is a great for solutions
Submitted by AnthonyMcClay on Wed, 10/29/2008 - 22:50.
Back to:
www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-10-2008/jw-10-ejb3.html.
I understand. Most of us have been burned from the promise of EJB 2.X. I am an old timer and developed with EJB 1.X and drank the kool-aid for EJB 2.1. Eventually I left the architecture for Spring and other frameworks, because they were right. It should not be so hard!
EJB 3.0 - is now very functional for all the reasons listed in this article.
This include a birth of the next serious Application Server to consider for production usage in the form of Glassfish (Sun Application Server)
I am a believer, because I build solutions.
I see how the "lightweight" frameworks are looking pretty heavy when they try to solve bigger enterprise class problems.
EJB 3.0 is a tool for solutions.
Great article.