Please join us at the new JavaWorld Q&A Forums. Your existing login will work there. The discussions here are now read-only.
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
This is great! All that remains for Sun to do is introduce multiple inheritence in Java 1.6, introduce a Java preprocessor in Java 1.7 and finally, get rid of the Java Virtual Machine altogether in Java 1.8 and have the Java compiler create target machine binary code directly. From then on, they can rename the language to C++. 
|
Skeeterhawk
Unregistered
|
|
I don't understand the issue you seem to have with these new language features. Even if Java were to include a preprocessor or allow the developer to generate cross platform byte code or machine native binary code via a java compiler option (Not exactly what you pointed to but I wouldn't be opposed to this.) Java will remain a better language then C++.
Lets not forget that these new features are not being forced on anyone. You are free to use then or not. Sure you will have to know and understand their uses in order to be a solid Java developer from here on but I don't see how these features weaken Java as an OOP language.
Cheers
|
|
0 registered and 0 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator:
Print Topic
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Rating:
Topic views: 5676
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
