Please join us at the new JavaWorld Q&A Forums. Your existing login will work there. The discussions here are now read-only.
daedalus_hammer
stranger
Reged: 03/25/07
Posts: 1
|
|
"Without a clearly defined dynamic model, you're only guessing how you will use a class's objects. Consequently, accessor methods often wind up in the model because you must provide as much access as possible since you can't predict whether or not you'll need it. This sort of design-by-guessing strategy is inefficient at best. You waste time writing useless methods (or adding unnecessary capabilities to the classes).
Accessors also end up in designs by force of habit."
Yup, that just sums it up (at least for a lot of my mistakes), and it's encouraged by people who learned "OOP" while on the job.
And those people mistake "OOP" idioms, and specific language idioms with actual OOP knowledge an programming skill.
|
|
0 registered and 1 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator:
Print Topic
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Rating:
Topic views: 6388
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
