Please join us at the new JavaWorld Q&A Forums. Your existing login will work there. The discussions here are now read-only.


JavaWorld Talkback >> 960462

Anonymous
Unregistered




Re: J2EE design decisions
      03/02/06 01:42 PM

I can see why you would think EJB 2 is obsolete or at the very least, taboo after reading this article. Keep in mind the author also wrote a book that he needs to sell, so he is a strong advocate of the POJO approach. Given that, I'm not surprised he never mentioned anything about performance and that a JDBC approach will ALWAYS perform better than an object-relational mapping (persistence) approach. So, if you have a high volume application and like your job, you might want to seriously consider the performance aspect of the argument. The extra coding effort required is usally worth it, and not that much extra to begin with. Otherwise, be prepared to tell your boss how great and "OO" your code is as he boots you out the door for writing an application that can't handle any kind of load in the real world.

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* J2EE design decisions JavaWorld 01/27/06 04:20 PM
. * * Re: J2EE design decisions uttlylovely   08/01/08 12:09 AM
. * * Re: J2EE design decisions MacBlaster   01/31/06 04:14 PM
. * * Re: J2EE design decisions Anonymous   03/02/06 01:42 PM
. * * Re: J2EE design decisions    01/16/08 06:32 PM
. * * Re: J2EE design decisions Anonymous   05/30/06 01:14 PM
. * * Re: J2EE design decisions    06/27/07 05:53 PM
. * * Re: J2EE design decisions JDBC user   02/09/07 04:26 AM
. * * Re: J2EE design decisions    01/21/08 10:20 AM

Extra information
0 registered and 1 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 14775

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact us JavaWorld

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5