Page 2 of 3
It is conceivable that in order to construct a datagram packet, the object must be converted into a byte array. This conversion can be very difficult to achieve if the object is involved in a complicated object graph. A number of published articles have discussed ways in which to implement the object serialization -- that is to pickle (to serialize or to marshal) and unpickle (unmarshal) Java objects into (from) byte stream. However, because the object graph can be very complex, converting a general object graph into a byte array will likely require substantial coding efforts.
So, how do we avoid writing complex pickling code? Here is a way to transmit objects in datagram packets without coding for pickling.

The above figure illustrates the data flow when transmitting an object through a datagram. Following the seven steps given
below, you will be able to implement this data flow that transmits an object, myObject, of any object type.
myObject, serializable by implementing serializable interface.ByteArrayOutputStream object, called, for example, baoStreamObjectOutputStream, say ooStream, using baoStream.myObject to baoStream by calling the method writeObject() of ooStream.baoStream, using its method toByteArray().DatagramPacket, say, dPacket, using the array buffer retrieved from Step 5.dPacket through the DatagramSocket by calling its method send().
To receive an object, go through the steps listed above but in reverse order, replacing ObjectOutputStream with ObjectInputStream and ByteArrayOutputStream with ByteArrayInputStream.
When programming with a socket, sendTo is a standard function used in the connectionless protocol. I rewrote this function so as to be able to transmit objects.
The following code example shows how to implement the send method in a Sender class:
import java.io.*;
import java.net.*;
public class Sender
{ public void sendTo(Object o, String hostName, int desPort)
{ try
{ InetAddress address = InetAddress.getByName(hostName);
ByteArrayOutputStream byteStream = new
ByteArrayOutputStream(5000);
ObjectOutputStream os = new ObjectOutputStream(new
BufferedOutputStream(byteStream));
os.flush();
os.writeObject(o);
os.flush();
//retrieves byte array
byte[] sendBuf = byteStream.toByteArray();
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(
sendBuf, sendBuf.length, address, desPort);
int byteCount = packet.getLength();
dSock.send(packet);
os.close();
}
catch (UnknownHostException e)
{
System.err.println("Exception: " + e);
e.printStackTrace(); }
catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
The code listing below demonstrates how to implement a receive method in a Receiver class. Method recvObjFrom is for the receiver to receive the object. You can include this method in your code to receive runtime objects.
import java.io.*;
import java.net.*;
public class Receiver
{ public Object recvObjFrom()
{ try
{
byte[] recvBuf = new byte[5000];
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(recvBuf,
recvBuf.length);
dSock.receive(packet);
int byteCount = packet.getLength();
ByteArrayInputStream byteStream = new
ByteArrayInputStream(recvBuf);
ObjectInputStream is = new
ObjectInputStream(new BufferedInputStream(byteStream));
Object o = is.readObject();
is.close();
return(o);
}
catch (IOException e)
{
System.err.println("Exception: " + e);
e.printStackTrace();
}
catch (ClassNotFoundException e)
{ e.printStackTrace(); }
return(null); }
}
One may worry about the size of the byte array -- because when you construct ByteArrayOutputStream or ByteArrayInputStream, you have to specify the size of the array. Since you don't know the size of a runtime object, you will have trouble specifying
that size. The size of a runtime object is often unpredictable. Fortunately, Java's ByteArrayInputStream and ByteArrayOutputStream classes can extend their sizes automatically whenever needed.
12 Years and no comment that this example never workedBy Anonymous on November 17, 2009, 12:35 amAfter 12 years , no one has actually tried to compile this and comment that it does not work. Where is dSock defined? In the first example, it will not compile...
Reply | Read entire comment
Very helpfulBy Anonymous on October 31, 2009, 4:03 pmThanks this is a very clear article. Good job
Reply | Read entire comment
ThanksBy Anonymous on June 12, 2009, 1:39 amCongratulations Shengxi Zhou. It's a very well written article. It was simple to follow and up to the point. Warm Regards, ghd
Reply | Read entire comment
Thank you very much! I am going to implement the same...By Anonymous on March 23, 2009, 8:59 pmThank you very much! I am going to implement the same. I am sure this must work.
Reply | Read entire comment
thanks heaps for ur helpBy Anonymous on October 5, 2008, 11:55 amthat was avery comprehensive description of how serialisation works in sockets. At many other places they give no idea about serialising using datagram sockets. Thanks...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments