Recent articles:
Popular archives:
Java: A platform for platforms
Sun's reorg may seem promising to shareholders but it's also a scramble for position. The question now is whether Sun can,
or wants to, maintain its hold on Java technology. Especially with enterprise leaders like SpringSource and RedHat investing
heavily in Java's future as a platform for platforms
Also see:
Discuss: Java: A platform for platforms?
According to John Zukowski of the MageLang Institute and JavaWorld, developers will receive the benefit of keeping their innovations proprietary, instead of sharing them with Sun:
"What they've done now hasn't really changed the access but [it does allow] you to do different things with that access. Previously, any changes, improvements, enhancements a company made had to be returned to Sun ... [Such changes were then] provided to the other licensees. This discouraged improvements."
Moreover, according to Sun, licensees can share innovations among themselves without informing Sun or paying any additional royalties.
The new licensing model requires no up-front licensing fees, but Sun does require royalty payments from licensees who modify the source code and then distribute derivative products for internal production use or as commercial products.
The Java 2 SDK code release is part of Sun's Community Source Licensing program, which also includes other Sun technologies such as Jini. According to Sun, the new model blends the best aspects of open source and proprietary software license models.
"When we were looking at ways to change the licensing model, there used to be two choices: open source -- opening it up to everyone -- and proprietary," says Elizabeth McNichols, spokesperson for Sun. "The Community Source License tries to combine them both in an effort to evolve the technology while maintaining compatibility."
The 7,613-word Java 2 SDK Community Source legal document includes five license categories: Research Use, TCK (Technology Compatibility Kit), Internal Deployment Use, Commercial Use, and Trademark Use. (For the complete Java 2 SDK license, see Resources.)
While the Community Source License isn't "open source" as defined by other licensing models such as the GPL, according to Zukowski, "It's open in the sense that as long as the changes you make pass the compatibility test, you can keep them, instead of passing them on to Sun."
At the February 11 CityJava user group meeting in San Francisco, a panel of industry leaders -- including Jim Mitchell, VP of architecture and technology for Sun's Java Software Division -- discussed open source vs Sun's Community Source License program. One issue of contention among the panelists was the length and complexity of the license agreement for Sun's Jini technology as compared to open source licenses, a concern many believed would carry over to the as-of-then unpublished Java 2 license.
Tim Wilkinson, CEO of Transvirtual, asserted, "One of the problems with the [Jini] licensing ... is it's too complicated. And if somebody wants to start developing for it and it's complicated, and they don't have a lawyer, then they're just not going to do it ... You need to reduce the barrier to innovation."