|
|
Featured White Papers
Sponsored Links
-
Slow Apps? Overloaded DBMS? - FREE Download
FREE Download Feb 14 - March 7th Eliminate bottlenecks & maximize performance ScaleOut StateServer®
Court annuls Sun's Java injunction
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agrees with Microsoft on Java injunction but leans toward Sun on the case's merits
- Feedback
- Discuss
August 23, 1999 -- A US court of appeals today dealt Sun Microsystems Inc. a set-back in its court battle to show that Microsoft Corp. illegally "polluted" the Java programming language in a bid to undermine its success.
In an opinion released today, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed with Microsoft's contention that a lower court erred when it granted Sun a preliminary injunction in the case. The injunction, awarded in November 1998, prevented Microsoft from using a version of Java in its software that wasn't fully compatible with Sun's.
At the same time, however, the appeals court allowed that Sun has amassed "significant evidence" in its case against Microsoft, and basically upheld the lower court's opinion that Sun is likely to prevail in the case based on its merits. What the appeals court is looking for is an explanation from the lower court as to the legal grounds on which it granted Sun the injunction.
"The appeals court just returned the injunction to (the lower court) for further clarification, so we don't view this as changing the characteristics of the case at all," Jon Kannegaard, interim president for Sun's software platforms and products group, said this afternoon in a teleconference.
The "mandate" issued by the appeals court will take 21 days to take effect, in which time Sun will ask Judge Ronald Whyte of the California District Court in San Jose to act speedily in order to ensure that the injunction doesn't lapse, said Lloyd "Rusty" Day, chief outside counsel for Sun.
If the injunction does lapse, Microsoft will be legally entitled to revert to using the version of Java in Windows 98, Internet Explorer, and its development tools that Sun says is incompatible, said Microsoft spokesman Adam Sohn.
"We're not at this time planning any substantial changes to our products. We will continue to support (Sun's version of Java) in our products, at least for now," Sohn said.
Microsoft views the appeals court's decision as "a positive step in a long case," he added, reiterating that the company believes its use of Java hasn't violated any laws.
Part of the disagreement between Sun and Microsoft centers around whether Microsoft's alleged behavior amounts to copyright infringement, as Sun contested, or whether it boiled down to a contract dispute, as Microsoft argued.
Judge Whyte determined it was an infringement case, which in legal terms entitled Sun to a claim of "irreparable harm." It was partly on that basis of irreparable harm that Whyte granted Sun the preliminary injunction. The appeals court today said Whyte never fully explained his reasons for treating the case as an infringement lawsuit, and on that basis returned his decision for further explanation.
"We agree with Sun that significant evidence supports the district court's holding that Sun is likely to prevail on its interpretation of the language of the agreement and to prove that Microsoft's conduct violated it," Judge Mary Schroeder wrote in the appeals court's majority opinion.
- Feedback
Resources
- A copy of the appeals court's decision is on the Internet at
http://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/web/newopinions.nsf/f606ac175e010d64882566eb00658118/57c1d9cf1577e739882567d60065ee66?OpenDocument - Microsoft, in Redmond, Washington, can be reached at http://www.microsoft.com/
- Sun, in Palo Alto, California, can be reached at http://www.sun.com/
About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Terms of Service/Privacy
Copyright, 2006-2010 Infoworld, Inc. All rights reserved.