Newsletter sign-up

View all newsletters

Sign up for our technology specific newsletters.

Enterprise Java

Email Address:

Java's creator discusses technology of Sun-Microsoft lawsuit

Gosling testifies on technical merits of Sun's claim

By Bill Day, JavaWorld.com, 10/01/98

September 9, 1998 -- Sun and Microsoft appeared in U.S. District Court in San Jose, CA in this week to present evidence and testimony supporting each of their arguments in the Sun vs. Microsoft case, which centers around Microsoft's implementation of Java technology. By everyone's reckoning, this is an important case, one which will have far-reaching effects on Sun and Microsoft as well as their partners, ISVs, and even end users. Please refer to the Resources for more information on the case.

For all the rhetoric, at its core this is a potentially straightforward contract law case. It has been complicated for the court, however, by the technical nature of the material in the contracts.

It isn't often that Perry Mason meets Java virtual machines and native method interfaces, but that's exactly what transpired at this week's hearings. James Gosling, the acknowledged creator of Java, spent more than two hours on the witness stand on September 9, giving an in-depth Java tutorial and explaining the technical issues critical to Sun's case.

The foundation for Sun's complaint

Sun Microsystems's legal basis for its case against Microsoft revolves around a few key points. They are:

• That Java's central promise, the most important feature in Sun's and many other developers' minds, is its cross-platform portability. Sun spent a lot of effort building this up; Microsoft's lawyers tried to tear it down at every turn.
  
  

• Sun held that Microsoft's implementation of Java violates this promise, and supposedly the letter of the law as specified in the Technology License and Distribution Agreement (TLDA), by breaking compatibility and portability. Sun asked that Microsoft be required to fix its Java products such that its code remains compatible with other runtimes (i.e., passes the Java Compatibility Kit tests).
  
  

• Furthermore, Sun held that Microsoft willfully chose to violate the contract. If true, this would allow Sun to claim damages done to its business and could be used to demonstrate anticompetitive business practices, not a boon for Microsoft as it currently faces antitrust actions from the US Department of Justice.

In order to lay the foundation for Sun's arguments, Sun's lawyers spent a great deal of time questioning Gosling on the technical details of Java, Java runtimes, and native method interfaces that allow Java applications to be cross-platform portable. What follows is a description of the technical material covered in Gosling's testimony, and of Microsoft's response. (You can review a written declaration from Gosling on the subject via the URLs in the resources at the end of this article.)

Are native methods portable?

Gosling spent some time explaining that the entire design of Java centers fundamentally around portability. This is true even with the native method interface, the Java Native Interface (JNI) beginning with Java 1.1 and beyond. (Interestingly, Gosling admitted that the Java 1.0 Native Method Interface (NMI) was really just a quick fix to help make Java available as soon as possible. Though the developers in the crowd already knew this, Microsoft's lawyers harped on this point later in trying to show that even Sun's own implementations of the JDK 1.0 and 1.1 were incompatible at the native code level because of Sun's changes to the interface.)

 

Improve efficiency with Visual Studio(r) 2010 Beta 2. - Microsoft

About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Terms of Service/Privacy

Copyright, 2006-2008 Network World, Inc. All rights reserved.