Is this software project doomed?
27 early warning signs that a project is going nowhere
By Esther Schindler, CIO, 12/10/08
- Digg
- Reddit
- SlashDot
- Stumble
- del.icio.us
- Technorati
- dzone
Despite all our efforts to make every software development project a success, some are cursed from the very start. CIO's Esther
Schindler has compiled 27 early warning signs (all real-world experiences from developers in the field) that an enterprise
software development project is headed for a death march.
27 signs that your project is doomed
- The project name changes for the third time in as many months.
- The development manager decides that it is better to write a completely separate version of the software for the U.K. rather
than to internationalize a single version.
- The requirements definition is begun four months after development started.
- The newly hired director of R&D proudly informs the board of directors that the project will be 99 percent completed six months
ahead of schedule, and assures the board that the software can ship directly to clients without going through beta testing.
- You are a Web developer. You open the zip file with the HTML documents the client produced for the site scripts you need to
integrate with the Web application. And you discover the client's HTML documents are all Microsoft Word files, saved in HTML
format.
- You realize the reason the company hired you as a consultant is to referee a dispute among two competing departments over
which technical platform to use.
- The memo says you will develop a 64-bit application using a 16-bit platform.
- The developer doesn't understand the spec document and continues to develop anyway. And the QA team doesn't know how to test,
but they "test" anyway.
- When you see the project budget, you realize that over half of it was spent on a Web designer to create a Photoshop mock-up
of the homepage -- with no regard to whether that design is feasible. Or with any attention to the thousands of pages of content
that will exist underneath that home page.
- The user or client requests new features instead of focusing on bug fixing and performance enhancements.
- You find a list of 16 software development best practices and realize that not a single one of them is being followed.
- You are asked to port your project from Windows to MS-DOS.
- The technical project manager asks you to compose the list of user requirements-without consulting any actual potential users.
- People started sending notes "to file" rather than to each other. The notes are alibis about why the sender has nothing to
do with the upcoming (but unacknowledged) failure.
- Status reports are seen as insubordinate.
- The new CIO replaces all the people who have deep organizational knowledge with outsiders from his old firm.
- It is a big project and is named Project Iceberg. Or it's the third time the company is trying to pull this off, and the project
is code-named "Phoenix." Somehow, you don't believe this one can spring from the ashes.
- Even the customers who got the free version are pissed off.
- The manager of your mission-critical project (handling 80 percent of the company's revenue) has three months exposure to the
technology of choice, and is training four brand-new developers at once. The manager is given a three-month project deadline.
- You learn that management had to insist that the interface definitions be checked into version control after the first code
freeze.
- They change the project manager and relocate the whole project from one city to another. (You consider yourself lucky that
the cities are on the same continent.)
- The QA team is told, "We've only allocated three weeks for testing" (on a project that has lasted six months already). Or
QA is told, "The date is fixed. We have to have all this functionality by that date."
- The program manager decided to try Agile methodology "to save time."
- In a previous era, pre-cell-phones and ubiquitous Internet access: You get screeching abuse from a new project manager hired
three days ago in New York, after you return from three days locked in regional CIO meetings in Frankfurt. Why? Because you
hadn't responded to the e-mail messages she had sent (and which you didn't get), and you hadn't updated her "project dashboard"
that you knew nothing about.
- Management decides to spend a million dollars on a US$20,000 project. Then the managers start agreeing with computer company
salespeople that the $1 million in software requires $2 million of hardware. Meanwhile, a secretary purchases an off-the-shelf
PC and a shrink wrapped CD containing some new office automation packages. She implements the project during her lunch break.
(Arguably, we should count this one as a success.)
- The lead developer tells you that maintaining a complete history of all database updates is a requirement for the application,
but he hasn't had time to (read: doesn't know how to) design a data model for it yet. So he decides to go ahead and start
with the Web front end and worry about it later. And this is the lead developer.
- The business line leader/project funder says, " Get creative." This happens after management reduces the project headcount
by 20 percent. And after the IT team pulls out the hardware that had been slated for recycling, saying it's your project's
new hosting environment.
That's a list based on input from dozens of software developers and IT professionals. But, alas, it is incomplete. Go on now
and add your moment of realization to the discussion at CIO.com.
- Digg
- Reddit
- SlashDot
- Stumble
- del.icio.us
- Technorati
- dzone
Resources
More from the IDG News Network
RequirementsBy Anonymous on February 10, 2009, 6:00 pmContract, price and time line are agreed to before the first analysis meeting, then after the 10th time the CTO agrees to scope creep and new requirements from a...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments